rionaleonhart: final fantasy versus xiii: a young woman at night, her back to you, the moon high above. (nor women neither)
Riona ([personal profile] rionaleonhart) wrote2015-05-19 08:57 am

The Third Triwizard Task Is 'Try Not To Drench The Book With Your Tears'.

I'd forgotten that Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is a really messed-up, horrible book. I've always thought of it as the bridge between the 'light' and the 'dark' Harry Potter books, leaning towards the light side, but there's an awful lot of darkness in here. Watching Crouch sentence his son to Azkaban in the Pensieve flashback is distressing enough, and then you find out what happened to Neville's parents, and then there's the ending.

And... all right, I feel strange talking about this outside a spoiler cut, even if the book's been out for fifteen years, so my notes on the ending are below:



I got so upset when Harry and Cedric agreed to take the Triwizard Cup together after both trying to nobly give it to the other - there's such respect between them, there's the potential for a real friendship to develop, and let's just agree that the book ends there, shall we?

(I don't really actively 'ship anything in the Harry Potter series, but I've always sort of liked the idea of Harry/Cedric. Although I'm not sure I can see it taking place anywhere in the canonical timeline. I feel that the seeds for a relationship are planted when they're working together in the maze, and then they... don't really have time to grow.)

I started to cry at 'Take my body back to my parents.' And then there's the scene where Harry's lying on the grass, clinging to Cedric's body, refusing to let go as everyone tries to prise him away, and I'm getting tearful again just thinking about this. I THOUGHT THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A CHILDREN'S BOOK.

I don't think Cedric's fate has ever hit me so hard before. I wasn't really expecting this reread to affect me that much emotionally, as I know these books so well, but apparently knowing what's coming provides no emotional defence!



When Moody is bringing the horribly traumatised Harry back to the castle after the events in the graveyard, he's described as 'half pulling, half carrying him' and later as 'helping him walk'. I'm startled and oddly sad to realise that the image of this scene I've carried since childhood was incorrect; I always thought that Moody was actually carrying Harry in his arms, like a child (with Harry mostly curled up into himself on account of aforementioned horrible trauma).


Back when I signed up for Pottermore, I was a little frustrated that I was Sorted into Hufflepuff when I'd always thought of myself as a Ravenclaw. I wondered whether perhaps it was because the Sorting quiz only pulled seven questions from a larger pool, so, when a quiz popped up elsewhere online with the entire pool of official Sorting questions, I tried that out.

The full quiz basically said 'you are the biggest Hufflepuff we've ever seen'.

I've come to realise that the Sorting Hat was absolutely right. I've always been a capable student rather than a brilliant one. If I can call myself intelligent, it's not inherent; it's something I've tried to work towards. And I do value the pursuit of knowledge, but I value kindness and fair play more. I think being in Hufflepuff would bring out the best in me.

There aren't many prominent Hufflepuffs in the Harry Potter series, but I think I can be proud of being in the same house as Cedric Diggory. And Makoto Naegi, who is not technically a Harry Potter character but is absolutely, unquestionably in Hufflepuff. He might as well be the Hufflepuff mascot. I will fight anyone who tries to say otherwise.

Newt Scamander was a Hufflepuff as well, wasn't he? I keep forgetting we're getting a trilogy of films about him! It's going to be so strange to have new Harry Potter canon.

I was going to say 'it's a shame that none of the book characters are going to show up, as the films are set seventy years earlier', but then I remembered that we could absolutely see Dumbledore in his late thirties. I'm up for this.
wolfy_writing: (Default)

[personal profile] wolfy_writing 2015-05-19 11:53 am (UTC)(link)
Goblet of Fire was the first of the books I read! I was looking after their neighbor's dog while they were out of town, and their son had left it lying around the house, so I picked it up, started reading, and read the entire thing in one sitting.

You are a Hufflepuff in the best possible sense. You're clearly very smart, but you're incredibly kind and caring and concerned about treating other people well. (I am apparently hilariously Gryffindor.)
wolfy_writing: (Default)

[personal profile] wolfy_writing 2015-05-19 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it'd be very confusing to go from the complex web of secrets, trauma, and politics to "Yay, come to wizard school where the candy is magic!"

Thank you!

[personal profile] nixwilliams 2015-05-19 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
*CRIES LARGE TEARS*
dancesontrains: A cute baby Galactus sucking on a meteorite bottle (Baby Galactus)

[personal profile] dancesontrains 2015-05-20 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Aw, poor doomed Cedric. Pottermore stuck me in Ravenclaw, but I suspect it was very close.
squeemu: Magpie holding a ring in its beak. (Default)

[personal profile] squeemu 2015-05-21 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
...man, I had totally forgotten how traumatizing Goblet of Fire was.

I had to go look this quiz up and I am apparently 92% Slytherin (closely tied with Ravenmore at 86%). I am not terribly surprised, although somewhat startled that I'm more Gryffindor than Hufflepuff.

I had not heard that there was going to be a new Harry Potter series! This is also pretty exciting. I'd love to see Dumbledore in his late thirties. I'm also excited to have a main character who's going to be a Hufflepuff; I always felt like they got the short end of the stick in the series.
Edited (extra thoughts) 2015-05-21 01:48 (UTC)
pete_thomas: (Default)

[personal profile] pete_thomas 2015-05-22 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Book four, for me was a pinnacle year in the Potter world. It was by far my favorite of the group, and I think the turning point for what made the series from a "children's book" as you called it, into a legacy. Don't get me wrong, there are many key, integral parts in all of the books, but none quite as... oh what's the word I'm looking for... critical? It's basically the pinnacle of what shapes up to be one of the best told stories in my reading history, and the one that begins truly crafting Harry as an individual. While books 1-3 he works on himself a bit, he's still struggling with his own petty issues with the Dursleys, Malfoy, and naturally, his fear of his parents' death/Voldemort. Book four starts shaping Harry into what we'd end up seeing by book 6-7. It is a true masterpiece and a work of art.

When I was sorted, I, too was put in Hufflepuff (did we talk about this before? I'm having terrible déjà vu). I remember hating it (even though J.K. Rowling herself spun it to say the houses that you didn't hear much about would grant the greatest reward) because I didn't think I fit. I was intelligent. I was brave. Hell, I could have even been cunning and manipulative if need be. But as I grew to know myself (just in the past few years or so) I realized the reason I got put into Hufflepuff is because at my core, I am a nurturer. An empath, through and through, and someone who puts others before self no matter how many times I've been walked on.

Sometimes we don't always know ourselves as well as we think we do until we have an eye opening experience that reminds us of why we are the way we are.
Edited 2015-05-22 17:43 (UTC)
kadrin: (Default)

[personal profile] kadrin 2015-05-26 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I am apparently, like Squeem, in the penumbra of Slytherin and Ravenclaw (making me a Slytherclaw or, more likely, a Rockingface). I don't see how you could possibly put Makoto Naegi in any house but Hufflepuff. The Hufflepuffs are well represented in Danganronpa, actually, since Hina is pretty much definitely one, and you could make an argument for Sakura and Oowada. Kiyotaka's probably a Hufflepuff; maybe a Gryffindor considering how shouty he is. Celestia Ludenberg pretty much has to be a Slytherin, as, I'd say, is Togami, even Twogami. Chihiro Fujisaki is the Tiniest Gryffindor, and particularly adorable, and should get a Potter book series any moment. Leon, Gryffindor. Kyoko, Ravenclaw. Toko, either Ravenclaw or Slytherin. Which just leaves Sayaka who could be in two or three houses depending on how you interpret spoiler spoiler spoiler, Hiro and Yamada who are very hard to classify, and Junko, who is complicated, and may end up being in all four houses.
kadrin: (Default)

[personal profile] kadrin 2015-05-26 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't have thought of it, but yeah, Mahiru definitely has the "charge ahead! make a plan later if at all!" attitude so emblematic of the Gryffindors.

I think the problem Naegi has with Gryffindor-sortings (Gryffindortings!) is that even Joanne Rowling had a tendency to define "Gryffindor" as "the good guys". And Naegi is quite definitively the good guy.

Junko puts on the Sorting Hat, the Sorting Hat EXPLODES.
pete_thomas: (Default)

[personal profile] pete_thomas 2015-05-27 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Hahaha! I was thinking when I read the first one "Hufflepuff High-Five-then-stare-afterwards-awkwardly-without-much-more-to-say-than-that!" But again, not as snappy. :)

[identity profile] littlered2.livejournal.com 2015-05-19 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
The thing I find odd about Hufflepuff (which is an excellent house) is that on the one hand you have the distinct house values of hard work, loyalty, fairness and so on, and on the other there's the fact that it's the house which takes "the rest". I imagine it as having a weird mix of students like Cedric who exemplify its best qualities and then a load of other students who just don't fit in any of the other houses. It must get irritating. ("No, I'm not just a leftover! I'm loyal and hard-working, I swear!")

Goblet of Fire is so dark. There's a bit of a theme of people doing noble self-sacrificing things which don't exactly work out, which is a bit of a weird message for a children's book - don't try to do the right thing, kids! It'll backfire on you! Harry and Cedric choosing to share the victory is the big one (what a lovely moment of unity! And now it's led to a horrible murder), but you also have things like Barty Crouch's mother sacrificing herself for her son, like Lily Potter, only for her son to use that opportunity not to save the wizarding world, but to help to ruin it; there's even Wormtail's devotion to his master going so far that he cuts off his hand for him. Essentially, sacrificing your needs for those of others isn't shown to have a brilliant track record.

[identity profile] wolfy-writing.livejournal.com 2015-05-19 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that's quite weird about Hufflepuff. It's one part admirable and important qualities, one part dumping ground for people who aren't distinctly anything.

Apparently Tonks was a Hufflepuff?

[identity profile] littlered2.livejournal.com 2015-05-19 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it does solve some, I suppose.

[identity profile] apiphile.livejournal.com 2015-05-20 06:25 am (UTC)(link)

As people keep reminding me, you are sorted based on your cakes (look at Lockhart!) Rather than your abilities. I am a little despondent, but not surprised, to have been shoved into Slytherin by every single quiz, official and non, even wheni was deliberately assuming for something else. Be proud of Hufflepuff! You have Cedric, andi couldn't cheat my way into your house.

[identity profile] apiphile.livejournal.com 2015-05-20 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Values! I'm afraid predictive text on the tablet and last-thing-after-night-shift levels of concentration lead to HILARIOUS CONSEQUENCES. Also, my cakes are not evil.

[identity profile] livii.livejournal.com 2015-05-26 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
I am a very, very, very proud Hufflepuff. (Though when I signed up for Pottermore I got Slytherin, which I can see as plausible, but don't accept since I think my Hufflepuff side is much stronger, unless my laziness overpowers my fairness and loyalty and sense of justice). (Which is, to be fair, pretty epic lack of hard work most of the time).

I think being in Hufflepuff would bring out the best in me.

This is a really great way of looking at it. I *could* fit into Slytherin, but I think the Hat wants to bring out your best qualities and push you, so Hufflepuff would indeed bring out the best in me, while Slytherin would be a lazy fit and leave me remaining very lazy.

I think this is the most I've written about HP in years. But omg, Hufflepuffs forever.

[identity profile] milliebee.livejournal.com 2015-05-26 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I know a lot of people that stopped reading Harry Potter on that fourth book, because of how dark it was. Cedric Diggory's death in particular caused a few of my friends to give up.

I, too, am a Hufflepuff. I was also a little disappointed at first, although I think, in hindsight, it's not because I don't like Hufflepuff as a house so much as because it's made out to be boring in the books. The characters from Hufflepuff are generally side-characters, and Harry never visited their dorms or learned much about Helga Hufflepuff. Until you get the secret info on Pottermore, it's ... kind of bland.

I have one of those soft toys you can put in the microwave to turn into a heat pad - it is a badger and is named Cedric, after Harry Potter.

[identity profile] livii.livejournal.com 2015-05-28 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm, interesting point on that being the crossover quality! I am not ambitious enough to have ever really realized that as being necessary to achieve it. But you are quite right. I still think I'm a slightly Slytherin Hufflepuff, but I'm not sure how to explain why...

(Yes but we were RIGHT about Hogwarts: A History finally being of some necessity! And Harry and Ron being idjits for never reading the damn thing!!!)