Riona (
rionaleonhart) wrote2011-05-04 09:47 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Not-Really-Subliminal Message: Yes To AV.
Yesterday, I absently thought 'hmmm, I wonder when the new series of Waterloo Road is going to start?', and I looked it up, and SURPRISE, IT'S TOMORROW (by which I mean tomorrow from yesterday's perspective, i.e. today). What on Earth, Waterloo Road? The sixth series only finished a month ago!
Still, I'm not complaining. Spoiler blackout for
reipan's benefit; highlight to read: Except I am complaining, because after turning the television off at the end I sort of freaked out and cried a bit. WATERLOO ROAD HOW CAN YOU DO THIS TO ME. I was so happy to see you again and you turned around and punched me in the gut. Sam I love you so much :( :( :( :( :(
Not-really-spoilery notes on the episode (7.01):
- TOM IS CLEAN-SHAVEN. WHAT. For a while it was in danger of making me like him a bit less, because he was clean-shaven way back in the first two series, when he was an arsehole. For all I knew, all his morality was contained in his stubble. But apparently he has not regressed in character, which is nice.
- Josh has lopped off all his beautiful curls and it is a tragedy. :(
- Sambuca looks completely adorable in her reading glasses! Everyone who made fun of her is an idiot. Guys, if you mock her she might take off her glasses. Have you seen what she looks like in those glasses?
- I want Sam to be the Doctor's companion. She would be wonderful. Somebody write this.
On a much more serious note: AV referendum day tomorrow, UK voters! If you haven't yet decided how you're going to vote, do me a favour and vote Yes?
AV, in case you're not clear on it, works like this:
- Voters rank candidates in order of preference.
- If a candidate has over 50% of the vote, they win. If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is knocked out and the votes for that candidate pass to the voters' second preferences.
- Repeat until one candidate has over 50% of the vote.
- Winner!
It is not nearly as complicated as the No campaign is making it out to be. (Here is a rather excellent video explanation with cats!)
(Special invisible browser ink that can be read only by supporters of the left: under FPTP, the current system, the Conservatives have an unfair advantage because they're the only viable right-wing party; the right are united behind them, and because the left-wing voters are split between Labour and the Liberal Democrats the Conservatives can sail past the divided votecounts of the other parties, even if the majority of voters in a constituency are on the political left. AV makes a lot more sense, in my eyes. Then again, I'm not a Conservative.)
The No campaign is exaggerating the cost of AV, incidentally. The £250 million figure being bandied about includes the £91 million being spent to have the referendum in the first place, which is happening whether you vote Yes or not, and the £130 million cost of the electronic vote counting machines that there are no plans to introduce. Basically, the No campaign is a pack of outrageous lies and actually makes me quite angry.
ALSO, 'UNDER AV THE CANDIDATE WHO COMES SECOND OR THIRD COULD BE THE WINNER': TOTAL NONSENSE. YES, UNDER AV THE CANDIDATE WHO WOULD COME SECOND OR THIRD UNDER FPTP MIGHT BE THE WINNER. You may as well just say 'under AV the results will be different!'
THAT'S SORT OF THE POINT OF VOTING REFORM.
So, yes! AV referendum tomorrow. Please vote Yes to AV? Or, you know, you can vote against it if you really want to. I'll still love you. But please do consider voting Yes.
(My evil plan comes to fruition! Step one: accumulate blog readers; step two: influence political outcomes. YEAH.)
Still, I'm not complaining. Spoiler blackout for
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Not-really-spoilery notes on the episode (7.01):
- TOM IS CLEAN-SHAVEN. WHAT. For a while it was in danger of making me like him a bit less, because he was clean-shaven way back in the first two series, when he was an arsehole. For all I knew, all his morality was contained in his stubble. But apparently he has not regressed in character, which is nice.
- Josh has lopped off all his beautiful curls and it is a tragedy. :(
- Sambuca looks completely adorable in her reading glasses! Everyone who made fun of her is an idiot. Guys, if you mock her she might take off her glasses. Have you seen what she looks like in those glasses?
- I want Sam to be the Doctor's companion. She would be wonderful. Somebody write this.
On a much more serious note: AV referendum day tomorrow, UK voters! If you haven't yet decided how you're going to vote, do me a favour and vote Yes?
AV, in case you're not clear on it, works like this:
- Voters rank candidates in order of preference.
- If a candidate has over 50% of the vote, they win. If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is knocked out and the votes for that candidate pass to the voters' second preferences.
- Repeat until one candidate has over 50% of the vote.
- Winner!
It is not nearly as complicated as the No campaign is making it out to be. (Here is a rather excellent video explanation with cats!)
(Special invisible browser ink that can be read only by supporters of the left: under FPTP, the current system, the Conservatives have an unfair advantage because they're the only viable right-wing party; the right are united behind them, and because the left-wing voters are split between Labour and the Liberal Democrats the Conservatives can sail past the divided votecounts of the other parties, even if the majority of voters in a constituency are on the political left. AV makes a lot more sense, in my eyes. Then again, I'm not a Conservative.)
The No campaign is exaggerating the cost of AV, incidentally. The £250 million figure being bandied about includes the £91 million being spent to have the referendum in the first place, which is happening whether you vote Yes or not, and the £130 million cost of the electronic vote counting machines that there are no plans to introduce. Basically, the No campaign is a pack of outrageous lies and actually makes me quite angry.
ALSO, 'UNDER AV THE CANDIDATE WHO COMES SECOND OR THIRD COULD BE THE WINNER': TOTAL NONSENSE. YES, UNDER AV THE CANDIDATE WHO WOULD COME SECOND OR THIRD UNDER FPTP MIGHT BE THE WINNER. You may as well just say 'under AV the results will be different!'
THAT'S SORT OF THE POINT OF VOTING REFORM.
So, yes! AV referendum tomorrow. Please vote Yes to AV? Or, you know, you can vote against it if you really want to. I'll still love you. But please do consider voting Yes.
(My evil plan comes to fruition! Step one: accumulate blog readers; step two: influence political outcomes. YEAH.)
no subject
I think that might be my favourite sentence ever committed to print.
no subject
no subject
Damn my mobile broadband dongle.
I'm writing fanfiction instead, until tomorrow when I'll be in decent distance of a tv XD
no subject
*This statement may well be totally made up but THAT IS PRETTY MUCH WHAT THE NO CAMPAIGN HAVE BEEN DOING ALL ALONG SO THEY DESERVE IT.
no subject
no subject
I really hope some detailed breakdowns of how people voted based on age/race/political affiliation/geographical location etc. get released at some point because I want to see if my suspicions are correct...
no subject
I also had no idea voting is tomorrow. I guess I'm not voting then.
no subject
no subject
But... I don't even know how to vote. I mean, physically, how to cast a vote. Shouldn't I have received something telling me about this if I'm supposed to vote on something? But I haven't. *is completely bemused*
no subject
let me have a go at explaining it
Re: let me have a go at explaining it
(I'm sorry! My brain is just not wired the same as most peoples', I'm sure. There are things I can never take in.)
Re: let me have a go at explaining it
AV: here are contestants. Voting takes place. The contestant with the smallest share of the votes is eliminated. Second round of voting, in which everyone who voted for the eliminated contestant in the first round switches to their favourite of the remaining contestants instead.
Basically, AV makes sure that nobody's vote is wasted, even if their favourite is unlikely to win outright. And I think that's a good thing; it means that nobody's forced to vote for a party that isn't the party they really want just because it's 'safer'.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
There's no actual reason you should vote No given. What it's saying, as my brother pointed out, is 'Here's why you should vote No to AV: you're stupid and you can't understand it.'
no subject
There was a good bit in Private Eye recently, a two column piece, on the left 'the Yes campaign explain why you should vote yes' *list of actual points given by the campaign*. On the right: 'the No campaign explain why you should vote no' *big picture of Nick Clegg*.
no subject
no subject
Basically, AV = Yay-V when it comes to tomorrow's referendum.
no subject
I've heard it said that, although MPs may get in through FPTP, AV is what they use within their parties to allot leaders/positions...
I've used an AV-alike voting system and it's really not at all complicated for the voter. It's high time we had voting reform!
no subject
no subject
I also got sombody to switch from No to Yes by saying "If you vote No you'll be makeing Tory Dave a happy man"
no subject
no subject
(By which I mean vote yes.)
no subject
...But that's just me handing out my political opinion like cheap cigars, so! Instead: awww, kitties ♥
no subject
Excuse me rambling, I hope some of that made sense. My head's feeling a bit scrambled right now. Basically, thank you for helping me come to a decision about this AV thing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Unlike in America, where everything is still crap. Politically, anyway.
no subject
no subject
It's really good to see a nice clear explanation rather than just the point that Cameron won't like it.
(That is just a happy side effect!)
no subject
It kinda makes me laugh because you can so tell people's political inclinations from which way they vote - Tories, no; Lib Dems, yes; Labour, meh.
no subject
no subject
j/k, it sounds much better than FTPT because votes actually count more. Now I need to find my polling station. I think it's a school, so I think it's only going to be open from about 4pm :/
no subject
We got a "No to AV" leaflet through our door with a super-shifty picture of Nick Clegg on it, in a kind of "DON'T SUPPORT THIS MAN, LOOK AT HIM WITH HIS SHIFTY EEEEYES" sort of way. Jo has just out the picture and stuck it on our light switch so that it looks as if shifty Nick is turning on the kitchen fan. FOREVER.
(I need to talk to you*! Call me later?)
*not about anything bad! I love you.
no subject
(Later because you're busy now? I could theoretically call you now. Is this about weekend-related plans? Yuffie called me with a proposal that sounds fine to me; have you spoken to her?)
no subject
no subject
OH GOD THAT ENDING. I just... I finished watching the episode about five minutes ago. I'm still crying and my hands are shaky.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think I might just go live in the lolitics fandom for a while and content myself with fanfiction and pretend the real world doesn't exist.
no subject
After we went to vote tonight, she confessed I'd changed her mind into voting yes. ^_^ You're now even politically influencing by proxy! Be proud!
no subject
no subject
Thank you for the cat video! I just looked at the description and it has a DISCLAIMER ABOUT DOGS NOT BEING INHERENTLY RIGHT-WING, which delights me more than is probably reasonable.