Exhibit D was not a statement of fact, madam. Facts are supported by evidence. There is no evidence, save that propagated by mass opinion, that repeating something at the same time a week after it was first shown is daft. It was a statement of opinion, and therefore has no place in a court case such as this.

The world's media seems to be conspiring to convince me it was on last week. The accuser sees nothing against dimension-switching in any laws laid down by the British government.

AND I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE SO HA. I refer your Honour to a Mr Christopher Ham(m)er, who recalls seeing a trailer for something Life-On-Marsy last week.