rionaleonhart: okami: amaterasu is startled. (NOT SO FAST)
Riona ([personal profile] rionaleonhart) wrote2016-04-21 07:56 pm

That History Book On The Shelf, It Could Probably Use More Thorough Reading Actually.

I DIDN'T KNOW WATERLOO IN LONDON WAS NAMED AFTER THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO. For my entire life I've thought the Battle of Waterloo was fought in London! I'm so embarrassed.

(I told my dad this. He asked if he could get a refund from my school.)


Just finished a replay of Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag (it seemed necessary after Pirates of the Caribbean) and got tearful all over again at the ending. Of all the Assassin's Creed games, I think Black Flag has the story I get most invested in, perhaps because it's so small-scale and personal. The focus is very much on Edward and all that he learns and all that he loses, rather than on the Assassin-Templar conflict.

This is why Black Flag is one of my favourite games in the series, even though two thirds of the missions are terrible. Tailing isn't fun! Eavesdropping is a nightmare! Naval combat is - well, actually I enjoyed the sailing bits a lot more on this playthrough than I did on my first. Which is good, and not just on the revelatory 'videogames are better when you enjoy playing them' level; it was difficult to get into Edward Kenway's mindset when he was so at home on the water and I was so miserable. But there's no excuse for the missions where you have to tail in the ship.

Edward/Kidd is still the best pairing. Amazing discovery on this replay: in the opening cutscene of an early mission ('A Single Madman'), Kidd pats Edward on the arse. I want them to have so much sex where Edward's painfully in love and Kidd's just going 'need some stress relief; I suppose you'll do.'

On this replay, I really got the sense that Anne Bonny could have been Edward's second wife if things had gone slightly differently, although there would always have been the strange underlying sadness of their shared loss. It's an intriguing thought, but in that universe we'd never have had Haytham and the horrible but fascinating Haytham-and-Connor relationship, and that would have been a tragedy.


Here's something that's been bothering me. In the original Pokémon games, Professor Oak shows up to congratulate your rival on becoming the Pokémon Champion. On finding out that you've beaten him, though, he scolds your rival: 'I'm disappointed! I came when I heard you beat the Elite Four! But, when I got here, you had already lost!'

Isn't that a bit harsh? However briefly, your grandson was the best Pokémon trainer in the country. Most people are never going to achieve those heights! Give him a bit of recognition, Oak, for goodness' sake.
wolfy_writing: (Default)

[personal profile] wolfy_writing 2016-04-21 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Did you not read Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell, then? Because it firmly establishes that the Battle of Waterloo took place in Belgium and involved a wizard.
wolfy_writing: (Default)

[personal profile] wolfy_writing 2016-04-21 07:24 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a very historically informative book. It tells all about important events such as the time Northern England was taken over by a changeling magician for hundreds of years.
masu_trout: Delicious. ((PKMN) Lenora *Lace*)

[personal profile] masu_trout 2016-04-22 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
Professor Oak is so casually jerkish to his own grandson at various points in the game; in hindsight I really have to feel sorry for the kid, even if he was totally rude to me about my pokemon-training skills. >:|

I think the idea was to portray Oak as someone who realized his grandson was going about pokemon training in the wrong way and was disappointed he'd act so egotistical and dismissive of other trainers, but it doesn't really come off that way when you think about it too much.

(And also, it's kind of dismissive towards the protagonist too? "I was going to b proud of you, grandson, but when I showed up I found out you'd already lost to this kid.)