Riona (
rionaleonhart) wrote2007-07-01 01:07 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
This Is Probably Going To Blow Up In My Face.
Behind the cut, I talk about Why I Don't Particularly Like Jack/Ianto (why am I so ranty at the moment?). Spoilers for the first series of Torchwood (especially 'They Keep Killing Suzie' and 'Captain Jack Harkness') and 'Last of the Time Lords'. With thanks to
geekgirlofdoom for helping me actually realise why I didn't like it.
The basic gist of this rant is 'I don't mind the idea of the pairing in itself; it's the way it's presented in the canon that bothers me and makes it difficult for me to be enthusiastic about it.'
Torchwood is so clearly created to pander to the fangirls, and what it seems to believe is that we'll be blissfully happy if the two most attractive male members of the cast are suddenly revealed to be in a sexual relationship. I dare say some of us are happy with it, and there's nothing particularly wrong with that, but it doesn't work for me personally. When I pair up characters, it's not just because I find the pairing aesthetically pleasing (although I'll admit that that can help; I am not going to claim that I'm completely devoid of shallow inclinations, and I do find the idea of Doctor/Master more appealing when the Doctor hasn't been artificially aged); it is because I think that the characters interact in interesting ways. Before I went insane and started fancying Jeremy Clarkson, I thought that James May was much more attractive than him, but I was still more fond of Jeremy/Richard than of James/Richard because I was fascinated by the bickering we're-friends-but-we'll-never-admit-it dynamic.
It's not that I don't like the characters: I adore Jack (even though I far prefer his happier, more flirtatious character in Doctor Who; I rather hope that his having left the Doctor of his own accord this time means that he'll be more cheerful in the next series of Torchwood) and I like Ianto's quiet, dry humour very much when he's not bawling his eyes out; it's just that they barely seemed to say two words to each other before the sudden 'OH, YEAH, DID WE MENTION THAT WE ARE HAVING SEX? WE ARE. AREN'T YOU HAPPY NOW, SLASH FANS?'
The relationship between the two Jacks in the episode 'Captain Jack Harkness' (which was contained entirely within the space of fifty minutes, whereas the relationship between Jack and Ianto basically stagnated until the sudden 'oh, yes, and we are shagging' in 'They Keep Killing Suzie' - the eighth episode, so the writers were hardly lacking in time to build up the relationship) had everything the Jack/Ianto relationship didn't: it had gradual development, it had tension, it worked up the audience to the point of screaming 'FOR GOD'S SAKE, YOU'RE BOTH ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHER, REALISE IT' at the screen before making it solid text. That's what we ('we' meaning, er, 'slashers who are like me'; no offence is intended if your view is different) want. Before the characters kiss, we have to desperately want them to kiss. That's why we write slash: to make the subtext text. We need the subtext first; without it, the text has nothing to rest on. We would expect some sort of foreshadowing or chemistry before the confirmation of a heterosexual relationship; why should a homosexual relationship be any different? The writer shouldn't become complacent because he thinks 'well, the fangirls will be gagging for canon homosexuality, they won't care whether it's believable or not'. (Perhaps the writer was actually thinking 'won't it be great if Jack/Ianto is suddenly, unexpectedly revealed to be canon? A LOVELY SURPRISE FOR THE FANGIRLS.' While I'd be happier with the motives there, I'd still have been even happier if it hadn't been a SURPRISE PAIRING.)
I realise that this is taking too broad a view of why people pair characters up; after all, we may pair up characters who have never actually met in canon because we believe that they would relate to each other in an interesting way if they did, or we may write a pairing that makes no logical sense at all because we think it would be fun or, more likely, because
dracothelizard made us do it. These fanfics often explore the way the relationship develops, however. Even if they don't, it's 'just fanfiction' (I hate the term, but it does seem appropriate); it is not as expected to develop relationships believably over time as the canon is. In the canon, is it too much to ask for the revelation that Jack and Ianto are in a relationship to be an emotionally satisfying conclusion to a build-up of subtext?
Maybe the second series could have some sort of flashback to how the Jack/Ianto relationship came to be a sexual one? That would be nice.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The basic gist of this rant is 'I don't mind the idea of the pairing in itself; it's the way it's presented in the canon that bothers me and makes it difficult for me to be enthusiastic about it.'
Torchwood is so clearly created to pander to the fangirls, and what it seems to believe is that we'll be blissfully happy if the two most attractive male members of the cast are suddenly revealed to be in a sexual relationship. I dare say some of us are happy with it, and there's nothing particularly wrong with that, but it doesn't work for me personally. When I pair up characters, it's not just because I find the pairing aesthetically pleasing (although I'll admit that that can help; I am not going to claim that I'm completely devoid of shallow inclinations, and I do find the idea of Doctor/Master more appealing when the Doctor hasn't been artificially aged); it is because I think that the characters interact in interesting ways. Before I went insane and started fancying Jeremy Clarkson, I thought that James May was much more attractive than him, but I was still more fond of Jeremy/Richard than of James/Richard because I was fascinated by the bickering we're-friends-but-we'll-never-admit-it dynamic.
It's not that I don't like the characters: I adore Jack (even though I far prefer his happier, more flirtatious character in Doctor Who; I rather hope that his having left the Doctor of his own accord this time means that he'll be more cheerful in the next series of Torchwood) and I like Ianto's quiet, dry humour very much when he's not bawling his eyes out; it's just that they barely seemed to say two words to each other before the sudden 'OH, YEAH, DID WE MENTION THAT WE ARE HAVING SEX? WE ARE. AREN'T YOU HAPPY NOW, SLASH FANS?'
The relationship between the two Jacks in the episode 'Captain Jack Harkness' (which was contained entirely within the space of fifty minutes, whereas the relationship between Jack and Ianto basically stagnated until the sudden 'oh, yes, and we are shagging' in 'They Keep Killing Suzie' - the eighth episode, so the writers were hardly lacking in time to build up the relationship) had everything the Jack/Ianto relationship didn't: it had gradual development, it had tension, it worked up the audience to the point of screaming 'FOR GOD'S SAKE, YOU'RE BOTH ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHER, REALISE IT' at the screen before making it solid text. That's what we ('we' meaning, er, 'slashers who are like me'; no offence is intended if your view is different) want. Before the characters kiss, we have to desperately want them to kiss. That's why we write slash: to make the subtext text. We need the subtext first; without it, the text has nothing to rest on. We would expect some sort of foreshadowing or chemistry before the confirmation of a heterosexual relationship; why should a homosexual relationship be any different? The writer shouldn't become complacent because he thinks 'well, the fangirls will be gagging for canon homosexuality, they won't care whether it's believable or not'. (Perhaps the writer was actually thinking 'won't it be great if Jack/Ianto is suddenly, unexpectedly revealed to be canon? A LOVELY SURPRISE FOR THE FANGIRLS.' While I'd be happier with the motives there, I'd still have been even happier if it hadn't been a SURPRISE PAIRING.)
I realise that this is taking too broad a view of why people pair characters up; after all, we may pair up characters who have never actually met in canon because we believe that they would relate to each other in an interesting way if they did, or we may write a pairing that makes no logical sense at all because we think it would be fun or, more likely, because
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Maybe the second series could have some sort of flashback to how the Jack/Ianto relationship came to be a sexual one? That would be nice.
no subject
Ianto is evil. Now, don't laugh. I think Ianto is a spy, or a double-agent, or definitely has his own agenda. He's not, and never will be, a part of the Torchwood team - not properly. To me, it's blatant that he's shagging Jack for his own reasons, whatever they may be. To lull Jack into a false sense of security. Gareth David-Lloyd actually said at a con, re: S4, that Ianto is bisexual when it suits his purpose.
So the suddenness, the pastede-on aspect of Jack and Ianto's relationship totally works for me, because I can see it as something Ianto suddenly decided to do, in order to gain some small advantage over Jack.
And Jack, being Jack, he'd tap that.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Especially if evil!Ianto kills Owen. I'd like that even more. Actually, Ianto doesn't even need to be evil to do that.
And Riona, you have a good point in that Jack and Ianto don't really have chemistry together besides 'we look pretty together' but pairing up Jack with anyone else in Torchwood just makes my brain hurt, so it's the lesser of several evils.
Although if Jack decided to get it on with Rhys, I would laugh so much.
no subject
And the problem is that Ianto didn't need to be the lesser of several evils, because the Jack and Ianto relationship could have been wonderful if the writers had just shown us a little more of their interactions leading up to it, and they missed that chance. I get the impression that they wanted to make the 'stopwatch scene' an OMG SURPRISE! moment, and they managed that at the expense of on-screen development. I'd take the latter any time.
no subject
no subject
WORD to your rant - the Jack/Ianto thing seemed to pop out of nowhere, and it seems we were meant to buy into it because they both look cute. Doesn't work for me, either! I demand my subtext!!
no subject
no subject
I also think what you said is true for the relationships on
no subject
Also, I am much more interested in the first time two characters kiss than, say, the fourteenth. I like the feeling of potential, and we really got that in 'Captain Jack Harkness'- everything worked, the build-up, the slow realisation, the way the real Jack and the audience could see the other meanings in what our Jack was saying. Sudden revelations of sex-having only really work for me when it genuinely seems impossible that the characters in question aren't doing it- which was not the case with Jack and Ianto. Plus it was strangely difficult to work out the Jack/Ianto dynamic- why they were in the relationship, how serious it was, what each of them thought they were getting out of it. I second the flashback idea.
Or you could just argue that the only relationships RTD is really good at writing are the ones that are completely doomed.
no subject
Very much seconded. TBH I agree with most of this post. Hrm. NOW I HAVE NOTHING TO CONTRIBUTE.
no subject
Jack's sex aidhis hand back, Jack needs a new outlet.I'm ficcing about how the sexual relationship came about and where it's going because it's a MASSIVE swing from "I actually hate you and wish you were dead" to "lol, we're sexxing and happy". mostly because I think RTD shoudl NEVER BE ALLOWED TO WRITE ANY WHO VERSE STUFF EVER AGAIN!!!
no subject
The one that bothered me alot was the in the last episode was Ianto betraying Jack I know he saw Lisa and she is probaly his biggest weakness but I thought Ianto was smarter than that and would have trusted Jack to know what he was doing especialy considering they were in a kind of relationship
I like the idea of Ianto turing evil even just for one episode but not turning out to be a spy or anything as intresting as it would be. :)
oh well ramble finished for now I hope this is readable
no subject
no subject
no subject
Sorry, that went on a bit. TW could have been SO great, and it really isn't, and it makes me very sad.