Riona (
rionaleonhart) wrote2009-04-24 06:44 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
I Want To See The Zoo, She Said, I Want To See The Zoo.
WHILST I'M BEING INSECURE ABOUT MY WRITING: for as long as I can remember, I have used "double quotation marks" for speech in fiction and 'single quotation marks' for all other purposes. No style guide will recommend this: in British publishing convention, single quotes are used for all purposes, including speech, with speech within speech the only context in which double quotes are used; in American publishing convention, the situation is reversed. Does this inconsistency bother you? (Alternative question: do you have similar stylistic quirks?) I just think there's something quite nice about drawing a visual distinction between speaking and 'setting a phrase aside'. If there are two different types of quotation mark, why not put them to use?
Regarding Supernatural: I rewatched 'Fresh Blood' a little while ago, and it reminded me of how awesome Bela can be. I love that she actually seems surprised and a little upset that Dean is so angry with her for telling a murderous madman where to find them. HONESTLY, DEAN, YOU'RE SO OVERSENSITIVE. And then she helps them track him down, because, hey, she didn't know Dean was going to be so unreasonable about the whole thing. I love her.
HERE IS SOMETHING I WOULD LOVE TO SEE: a rewritten Twilight, with Bela in the role of Bella. Edward may be ridiculously strong and fast, but if he can't hear Bela's thoughts he's doomed. She will seduce him, use him shamelessly and then run off with his sister to form an amazing con artist duo. It would be pretty great. And at least Bela's unsympathetic aspects are intentional, unlike those of Bella 'Stupid Unattractive Humans With Their Stupid Being Nice To Me' Swan.
(Jo is welcome to join Bela and Alice in their con-artistry.)
(Also, Ruby can flit between the three of them, although I have not yet decided whether she would assist with the cons or whether she would ruin them for her own amusement by possessing the team members at inopportune moments.)
Regarding Supernatural: I rewatched 'Fresh Blood' a little while ago, and it reminded me of how awesome Bela can be. I love that she actually seems surprised and a little upset that Dean is so angry with her for telling a murderous madman where to find them. HONESTLY, DEAN, YOU'RE SO OVERSENSITIVE. And then she helps them track him down, because, hey, she didn't know Dean was going to be so unreasonable about the whole thing. I love her.
HERE IS SOMETHING I WOULD LOVE TO SEE: a rewritten Twilight, with Bela in the role of Bella. Edward may be ridiculously strong and fast, but if he can't hear Bela's thoughts he's doomed. She will seduce him, use him shamelessly and then run off with his sister to form an amazing con artist duo. It would be pretty great. And at least Bela's unsympathetic aspects are intentional, unlike those of Bella 'Stupid Unattractive Humans With Their Stupid Being Nice To Me' Swan.
(Jo is welcome to join Bela and Alice in their con-artistry.)
(Also, Ruby can flit between the three of them, although I have not yet decided whether she would assist with the cons or whether she would ruin them for her own amusement by possessing the team members at inopportune moments.)
no subject
Also, I pretty much do what you do re: double quotes and single quotes. I don't consider it an issue so much.
Deliberately compounding my thoughts on the matter this time. :P
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And I am glad you like the crossover idea!
Now write it.(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Single quotation marks in fic do strike me as a bit odd, though, perhaps because I've come to expect a certain type of punctuation on the screen.
(I always use single quotes when I'm writing by hand, but I suspect that may largely be due to laziness.)
(no subject)
no subject
-Speech goes here. Action goes here. -More speech by the same speaker here.
It was really strange, but it actually just made me love the fic all the more as I really liked the very, very unusual style in which it was written.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yet another fandom intrusion into my life.
no subject
(Actually, single quotation marks for speech in fanfiction look odd to me as well. I'm just so used to double quotation marks when I'm reading something on a screen.)
(no subject)
I think this is my only icon with a book in it, so it'll do for a comment about writing.
I do the same thing! I wonder if it's something I unconsciously picked up from fanfiction? Because I did it even in my first piece of English fanfiction, and I also did it in my first piece of Dutch fanfiction, which I wrote before I even really knew what fanfic was. Although I did read Savage Garden RPF on forums before I really knew what fanfic was, so maybe I picked up the double quotation mark thing for speech from that.
The adventures of Bela are a version of Twilight I would actually read!
Re: I think this is my only icon with a book in it, so it'll do for a comment about writing.
Re: I think this is my only icon with a book in it, so it'll do for a comment about writing.
Re: I think this is my only icon with a book in it, so it'll do for a comment about writing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I have no idea if that's proper, but it works. I don't really notice different systems as long as they stay consistent and dialogue has something around it. My eyes aren't the best in the world, and I easily skip around/get lost without some kind of dialogue indicator (or at least italics).
My personal quirk is always typing two spaces after a period. Never mind it doesn't even show in HTML unless you do dirty things with non-breaking spaces, I...can't stand not to.
no subject
My mum also inserts two spaces after a full stop. Do you know why you do that? If I recall correctly (and I may well be very wrong), the 'two spaces after a full stop' rule originated from use of the typewriter, because one space wasn't very clear when all the letters were the same width. Did you ever use a typewriter? Were you just taught to insert two spaces?
no subject
no subject
no subject
YES, YES, THIS IS WHAT I DO. I was taught it at school and I will NEVER believe that single quotation marks should be used for speech.
no subject
(Er, edited because my icon made me look sarcastic.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Because I am slow.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
my stylistic quirks are mostly to do with in-text citation and reference lists, so i won't bore you with the details. however, i always double space after the end of a sentence (although the intert00bs tends to smoosh it back into one space).
no subject
I don't tend to notice single versus double, really. I notice the French style, but I can work with it. I'll only read stuff where speech is either not marked or marked in a a gimmicky style if it's clever and flows logically with the story (like "The Butcher Boy" where it's supposed to come off like the entire books one Giant Rambly Insane Monologue Of Doom).
I approve of Bela and Alice and Ruby, and even Jo (not enthusiastic about her, but I don't mind her). I also approve of Bela and Alice and Ruby and even Jo With Added Femmeslash.
I'm still trying to work out why Alice would meet the Top Gear Trio, although I'm convinced she'd drive Jeremy up the wall in a hilarious fashion (an attractive woman who likes Porsches and blurts out things like "No, I'm sorry, you're not going to get anywhere flirting with me. But don't worry, you'll be able to get into bed with your two friends as soon as you stop repressing and actually ask. I haven't got an exact timeline on that, so you may want to hurry things along by just asking now.")
no subject
no subject
no subject
I want to rewrite Twilight with Jeff and Neville as Edward and Bella, but I don't think I have the attention span for it.
As to writing quirks, I almost always stick commas and periods outside of single quotes ('like so'.) and I have no idea why. It's not grammatically correct, and it doesn't even look right, but I always do it. Maybe when I get published I'll make my editor leave it in, so that it's something that's mine and only mine alone. Another thing I do is use 'o' for '0'. (See? I did it there, too, without even meaning to.) That's intentional, because I did it as a typo once (they're right next to each other on the keyboard) and I thought it looked neat so I kept it.
And because I have to ask, where's your subject line from this time?
no subject
"speech"
'quotes within quotes, titles'
titles. I actually was taught a very specific way to write different titles in school, none of which involved italics, and when I asked Ms. English why, she said, "Because you can't write in italics by hand", which confused me, because I can. And often do. (it's not that hard.)
(thouhts within a thought)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Yes! I do not know why my country didn't go, "Oh, so that's the way we've been doing it? Great, let's do it the same way." But alas, it is the one I must use. (Also, I totally hadn't realized that was the accepted British format and now feel dumb. I've only seen it a few times... and actually I've known a few times that the people doing it weren't British — but anyway, I had no idea. SADFACE.)
Also, I probably over-use out-of-dialogue quotation marks like I overuse italics, which probably turns a lot of people away from my writing.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And thought like this. He thought.
With single quotes for certain... 'emphasis' on words, and for indirect quotes.
Except with using italics to quote chunks of stuff from posts on the internet when I'm going to be replying below.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)