Riona (
rionaleonhart) wrote2008-03-07 07:25 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
But What Are Their Thoughts On Incest?
Why is Sam always dominant in Sam/Dean fanfiction? Seriously, there are great big 'CAUTION: IMPLIED BOTTOM!SAM' warnings plastered all over fic that breaks this trend. Sam always seems to be the one who initiates the relationship shift, too, and the one who's more at ease with it. It can't just be because he's tall, surely? ...it's just because he's tall, isn't it?
All right, that's unfair of me; I'm just interested in why the idea of dominant, totally-okay-with-the-brothersex Sam is so prevalent in the Supernatural fandom, because it's not the way in which Sam/Dean works in my mind. I can see Dean having issues with it, of course, because he'd be keen to hold onto his heterosexual self-image (part of the reason the popularity of bottom-Dean surprises me; I can't see him taking what I'm sure he would think of as 'the girl's role' without a fight) and concerned about hurting Sam (and I'd say Dean's concern for his brother's mental and emotional well-being is the single largest obstacle to Wincest). But I imagine that Dean would probably be more at ease with the actual concept of incest, because he's embraced the fact that the Winchesters are Different, they are Not Like Other People, and he's so obsessed with his family that I don't think the idea of letting anyone else into his life has even occurred to him; if he wants anything remotely approaching a long-term romantic or sexual relationship, Sam is his only option. I can even see him thinking of that as obvious. "Of course my brother's the only person I could ever have more than a one-night stand with, pfft. Girls don't exist for more than two days."
Sam, though, Sam (for the first series, at least) has delusions that maybe one day he could find a nice girl, settle down, have a normal life. He doesn't view himself and his brother as being separate from the 'real world' in the way in which Dean does, and so he's less likely to think 'well, we're not part of society, so why should society's taboos matter?' I think that the concept of an incestuous relationship would freak him out far more than it would Dean, who is better able to handle the crazy.
I'm not saying 'THE ENTIRE SUPERNATURAL FANDOM IS WRONG', obviously; these are just my thoughts, how it works in my head, and I'd be very happy to hear another fan's perspective. I'm not quite half-way through Series Two yet, so there's a fair chance that episodes I have not yet seen may completely disprove the ideas I've built up about the Winchester brothers.
And 'Croatoan' broke my heart into a million billion tiny pieces, by the way. Just so you know.
All right, that's unfair of me; I'm just interested in why the idea of dominant, totally-okay-with-the-brothersex Sam is so prevalent in the Supernatural fandom, because it's not the way in which Sam/Dean works in my mind. I can see Dean having issues with it, of course, because he'd be keen to hold onto his heterosexual self-image (part of the reason the popularity of bottom-Dean surprises me; I can't see him taking what I'm sure he would think of as 'the girl's role' without a fight) and concerned about hurting Sam (and I'd say Dean's concern for his brother's mental and emotional well-being is the single largest obstacle to Wincest). But I imagine that Dean would probably be more at ease with the actual concept of incest, because he's embraced the fact that the Winchesters are Different, they are Not Like Other People, and he's so obsessed with his family that I don't think the idea of letting anyone else into his life has even occurred to him; if he wants anything remotely approaching a long-term romantic or sexual relationship, Sam is his only option. I can even see him thinking of that as obvious. "Of course my brother's the only person I could ever have more than a one-night stand with, pfft. Girls don't exist for more than two days."
Sam, though, Sam (for the first series, at least) has delusions that maybe one day he could find a nice girl, settle down, have a normal life. He doesn't view himself and his brother as being separate from the 'real world' in the way in which Dean does, and so he's less likely to think 'well, we're not part of society, so why should society's taboos matter?' I think that the concept of an incestuous relationship would freak him out far more than it would Dean, who is better able to handle the crazy.
I'm not saying 'THE ENTIRE SUPERNATURAL FANDOM IS WRONG', obviously; these are just my thoughts, how it works in my head, and I'd be very happy to hear another fan's perspective. I'm not quite half-way through Series Two yet, so there's a fair chance that episodes I have not yet seen may completely disprove the ideas I've built up about the Winchester brothers.
And 'Croatoan' broke my heart into a million billion tiny pieces, by the way. Just so you know.
no subject
I'd see Dean as having a harder time with the incest thing precisely because of the potential to hurt Sam; Dean's the older brother, and I have the impression that he did a lot of looking after Sam when they were growing up (John doesn't strike me as a guy who'd provide regular babysitting and make sure the kids had lunches ready every morning). Which means him initiating or participating has much more of an air of abuse, or at least worrying power imbalances. Whereas Sam, the kid brother, isn't going to feel like he's pressuring or taking advantage of Dean as much.
Sort of how I see family dynamics. I get what you mean about Dean's Winchesters Are Different thing, and Sam not buying into it as much. In my mind, the potential for abuse of power, and Dean worrying about what he might be doing to his brother, outweigh that.
no subject
Maybe I just prefer Dean as the initiator because I love Wincesty angst, and Dean is going to be pretty seriously distressed if he realises he was doing something that Sam didn't want. (Sam wouldn't want to hurt Dean either, of course, but I don't think he would handle the realisation quite so badly.)
Basically, screwed-upness is fun.
no subject
I just can't get my mind past Dean's whole, "I can't risk hurting my brother like that." Which is probably good.
Screwed-upness is fun.
no subject
(In my mind, the only scenarios where one of them would express discomfort, and the other one wouldn't completely back off right away, involve demonic possession.)
The thought of this just makes me want to cry. Oh, Winchesters. I love them so much, and that would be so horrible.
no subject
And considering the number of demons intent on horribly traumatizing them, unpleasantly plausibly (although I suspect this is a fandom cliche.)
If Dean did something to Sam while possessed, I think you would have to put him on suicide watch.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Interest? Concern? Overwhelmed by the awesome? Immediately thinking of that one story you really hope no one writes a remix for?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ha. There's me, sitting on the fence there! In all honesty, I can see both Dean and Sam being the initiators in different circumstances. Yeah, Sam is, or perceives himself to be, almost a normal person in abnormal circumstances, whereas Dean has completely embraced the fact that neither they nor their lives are normal, so yeah, Dean might be more open to the idea. And I think Dean needs Sam more than Sam needs Dean - that sounds silly, because if this show has shown anything it's that these boys are incapable of living with the other, but Sam can live that normal life, whereas Dean can't. Dean only ever had three things in his life - his dad, his brother and his car. Sam had a life, friends, an education - he may never go back to that, but he could.
But then I think Dean would perceive it as abuse or taking advantage of Sam - protecting Sam is hardwired into Dean's brain as 'Imperative A1' and I think he'd a difficult time getting around that. So I really don't know. I could one initiating as much as the other, so I don't see why people can't write both.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Oh, Croatoan! Dean's whole "I'm tired, Sammy" speech just, NNGH, MY HEART.
no subject
YES. And the fact that Sam is so clearly the only thing he has to live for. OH, DEAN.
Completly OT
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But then again, my conclusions are drawn from Mystery Spot and fannish osmosis :/.
no subject
And it turned out to be completely the opposite. Which is kind of cool, because I like it when the guy who reads less like a weepy-uke cliche to me bottoms (I'm weird that way), but kind of weird it the way 'Fandom has decided that this one guy is always the bottom' tends to be.
no subject
Also, I dunno if this has anything to do with it, but I've always thought that where a person comes into the series has an impact on their topping-bottom mentality (and characterization in general). There are folks who got into the most recent episode and work backwards; there are people who start chronologically at the beginning; there are those who just skip randomly!
And this sounds dumbest of all, but I think reading fanfiction beforehand has the biggest effect. I mean, that's how a lot of people get into it-- by reading stuff ahead of time, and deciding to get into the show that way, and a lot of the better stuff was Sam-top and Dean-bottom, which just sort of built upon itself.
And then I have all these vague theories on the appeal of incest to people-- whether you like it because of the dirtybadwrong feel or in spite of it, and that's how preferences for top-bottom develop. And theories about how favorite characters tend to get put on the bottom, or whatever, but I need to get back to work!
no subject
The point about where a person comes into a series having an effect on characterisation views is an interesting one; I started watching whatever scattered episodes I could find before I bought the DVDs and settled down to watch it chronologically, and I think I probably do think of Sam and Dean and their relationship slightly differently because I didn't start at the beginning. And the fanfiction explanation makes a lot of sense; that hadn't occurred to me.
If you ever have the time to expand on your appeal-of-incest theories, I'd be very interested! I adore Sam and Dean's non-sexual relationship, so the entire point of adding a sexual aspect - for me, at least - is the dirtybadwrong.
no subject
Sort of. Not if it fits neatly into a standard abuser/abused dynamic, but if it's screwed up in a complicated way. Which was why Riona was the perfect person to get me to actually read incest fic.
And then I went to read the Wincest com, and was bored senseless. Because it's mostly happy, well-adjusted, not screwed up in the slightest (and oddly enough, bothers me more than the screwed-up stuff).
As for bottoming, I know I tend to favor two things; the guy who doesn't fit the girly cliche, and the character I identify with the most. Which, er, yeah, Dean Winchester (although in practical terms, I'm more like Sam; can't shoot pool, and did nearly as well on my LSAT).
no subject
I, er, will point you to this illuminating poll (http://sevenfists.livejournal.com/124341.html) and the ficlet inspired by it (http://intimations.org/fanfic/supernatural/options.html) by
no subject
Don't mind me; I'm just thinking aloud. (Also: there is nothing nothing nothing that Dean wouldn't do for Sam - so true.)
And thank you for the links! The poll and the responses to it are indeed most illuminating, and that ficlet is rather brilliant.